The use of interactive methods of teaching Russian in a Kazakh school.
Keywords:
interactive methods, interactive methods-working students, collective form of work to the chain, didactic games, role play, a tolerant attitude,Abstract
The paper presents the developed and approved in rural Kazakh school of interactive methods of teaching Russian language. At the beginning of the article raises the problem of mastering of the Russian language the speaking in the Kazakh language population of a rural region, questions of application of active and interactive methods of teaching Russian language. Based on the study of the advantages of interactive teaching methods and a review of the relevant literature are presented techniques that will contribute to the organization of interaction in the group. Proposed structure of the lesson on interactive methodology, consisting of 8 stages, each of which are explained. Following is the experience of approbation of interactive methods of Russian language teaching in a rural Zhambyl school, describes the forms and methods of work, which are the main in the developed interactive method of teaching Russian language. The article will detail the role play as a special organized lesson in the interactive methodology, shows errors arising in the speech of the students and ways of their correction. In the end of the article concludes that the interactive methods of teaching the Russian language is a special form of organization of the educational process, the essence of which consists in joint work of students on the development of educational material, in the exchange of knowledge, deas, ways of activity. Argues that the main idea of the method is as soon as possible and natural inclusion of students in the process of active use of the language, since only this process can occur in both the linguistic and cultural adaptation. Offers used method of motivating students of Kazakh school literate mastering of the Russian language – orientation of all educational work on the Russian language on the thesis: the freer use of the language of interethnic communication, the more effective the dialogue, the wider the opportunity to present their own views on the world, wider opportunity to understand the other. Thus allegedly position of tolerance formation, extension of the language and cultural boundaries personality.References
1. Полат Е.С., Бухаркина М.Ю., Моисеева М.В., Петров А.Е. Новые педагогические и информационные технологии в системе образования.– М.: Издательский центр «Академия», 2004.
2. Кажигалиева Г.А., Васенкова М.В. О принципах и методах технологии интерактивного обучения русскому языку в средней школе//Педагогика, 2005. – №2. – С. 23-27.
3. Низамова М.Н. Когнитивные предпосылки усвоения русской грамматики в начальных классах // Білім берудегі менеджмент=Менеджмент в образовании. – 2005. – № 2. – С.71-75.
4. Горячева Г. Бессоюзное сложное предложение: закрепление орфографических и пунктуационных навыков учащихся, развитие навыков самоконтроля / Г. Горячева // Казахский язык: преподавание в школе, колледже и вузе. – 2005. – № 3. –С. 59-60.
2. Кажигалиева Г.А., Васенкова М.В. О принципах и методах технологии интерактивного обучения русскому языку в средней школе//Педагогика, 2005. – №2. – С. 23-27.
3. Низамова М.Н. Когнитивные предпосылки усвоения русской грамматики в начальных классах // Білім берудегі менеджмент=Менеджмент в образовании. – 2005. – № 2. – С.71-75.
4. Горячева Г. Бессоюзное сложное предложение: закрепление орфографических и пунктуационных навыков учащихся, развитие навыков самоконтроля / Г. Горячева // Казахский язык: преподавание в школе, колледже и вузе. – 2005. – № 3. –С. 59-60.
Downloads
How to Cite
Tazhibayeva., A. B. (2016). The use of interactive methods of teaching Russian in a Kazakh school. Journal of Educational Sciences, 39(2). Retrieved from https://bulletin-pedagogic-sc.kaznu.kz/index.php/1-ped/article/view/136
Issue
Section
Teaching Methodology of Disciplines