Internationalizing Higher Education Institutions in Kazakhstan.
Кілттік сөздер:
Internationalization, Bologna process, International office, Higher Education,Аннотация
The paper reports our research in the first phase of a three-part, threeyear Republic of Kazakhstan Ministry of Education and Science funded higher education research project: «Advancing Models of Best Practices of Internationalization in Kazakhstan». The focus of this study is «The Work of Internationalization Offices within Institutional Internationalization Strategy», and it seeks to understand the perspectives of International Office Directors in Kazakhstani Universities (n=48) on their role in the development and implementation of institutional strategic plans for internationalization. Key findings from this questionnaire-based study include: International Office Directors report having influence in developing institutional international strategy; they report significant support for their work from institutional leadership; and they report a strong desire for professionaldevelopment opportunities targeting their emerging needs as their work changes in the dynamic higher education policy context of Kazakhstan. The paper concludes with implications based in the study findings for further research by the Republic of Kazakhstan Ministry of Education and Science, as well as Kazakhstani and international academics, seeking to understand the changing work of International Office staff and the professional
development support needs important to them.
Библиографиялық сілтемелер
1 Knight J. Internationalization remodeled: Definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education. – 2004. – № 8(1). – P. 5–31.
2 Papatsiba V. Making higher education more European through student mobility? Revisiting EU initiatives in the context of
the Bologna Process // Comparative Education. – 2006. – № 42(1). P. 93-111.
3 Altbach P.G., Knight J. The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities //Journal of studies in international education. – 2007. – №11(3-4). – P. 290-305.
4 Hudzik J. K. Comprehensive internationalization: From concept to action. – Washington, DC: NAFSA, 2011. – 44 p.
5 Knight J., De Wit H. Strategies for internationalisation of higher education: Historical and conceptual perspectives. Strategies for internationalisation of higher education: A comparative study of Australia, Canada, Europe and the United States of America.
–European Association for International Education, 1995. – P. 5-32.
6 Heyl J. D., Tullbane J. Leadership in international higher education. Deardorff et al. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of international
higher education. – Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2012. – P.113-130.
7 Koehn P.H., Deardorff D.K., Bolognese K.D. Enhancing international research and development-project activity on university campuses: Insights from US senior international officers // Journal of Studies in International Education. – 2011. – №15(4).
– P. 332-350.
8 Taylor J. The management of internationalization in higher education. In F. Maringe and N. Foskett (Eds.), Globalization and Internationalization in Higher Education: Theoretical, Strategic and Management Perspectives. – London: Continuum, 2010. – P. 97-107.
9 Bryman A. Social research methods. – New York: Oxford University Press, 2012. –P. 808
2 Papatsiba V. Making higher education more European through student mobility? Revisiting EU initiatives in the context of
the Bologna Process // Comparative Education. – 2006. – № 42(1). P. 93-111.
3 Altbach P.G., Knight J. The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities //Journal of studies in international education. – 2007. – №11(3-4). – P. 290-305.
4 Hudzik J. K. Comprehensive internationalization: From concept to action. – Washington, DC: NAFSA, 2011. – 44 p.
5 Knight J., De Wit H. Strategies for internationalisation of higher education: Historical and conceptual perspectives. Strategies for internationalisation of higher education: A comparative study of Australia, Canada, Europe and the United States of America.
–European Association for International Education, 1995. – P. 5-32.
6 Heyl J. D., Tullbane J. Leadership in international higher education. Deardorff et al. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of international
higher education. – Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2012. – P.113-130.
7 Koehn P.H., Deardorff D.K., Bolognese K.D. Enhancing international research and development-project activity on university campuses: Insights from US senior international officers // Journal of Studies in International Education. – 2011. – №15(4).
– P. 332-350.
8 Taylor J. The management of internationalization in higher education. In F. Maringe and N. Foskett (Eds.), Globalization and Internationalization in Higher Education: Theoretical, Strategic and Management Perspectives. – London: Continuum, 2010. – P. 97-107.
9 Bryman A. Social research methods. – New York: Oxford University Press, 2012. –P. 808
Как цитировать
Sparks., J., & Ashirbekov., A. (2016). Internationalizing Higher Education Institutions in Kazakhstan. ҚазҰУ хабаршысы. Педагогикалық серия, 44(1). вилучено із https://bulletin-pedagogic-sc.kaznu.kz/index.php/1-ped/article/view/314
Шығарылым
Бөлім
Салыстырмалы білім беру
