Analysis of the External Assessment of Educational Achievements in Kazakhstan in 2019

Authors

  • R. Serikov National Testing Center
  • A. Khamzina National Testing Center
  • G. Zhabaeva National Testing Center

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26577/JES.2020.v63.i2.07
        79 67

Abstract

Due to the transition to market-oriented relations, the number of universities in Kazakhstan has increased,
which has led to competition at regional and national levels in higher education. To ensure the
competitiveness of an educational institution in the market of educational services, universities develop
and offer new educational programs that determine the level of professional training, offer a new pricing
policy, and introduce various innovations in the organization of education. In the article the authors
reviewed the indicators of the results of the external assessment of educational achievements (EAEA) of
Higher education for 2019. Statistical data is presented in the context of directions and disciplines based
on the results of the EAEA in 2019. A quantitative analysis was performed. A comparative analysis is also
presented in the disciplines “Information and communication technologies” and “Foreign language (English)”,
statistics of the average score in the context of directions. According to the results of EAEA you can
see the strengths and weaknesses of the level of knowledge of students and evaluate the effectiveness of
the educational process through comparative analysis of fields, professions, disciplines among universities.
The results of the EAEA allow carrying out the state monitoring, which is used to assess the quality
of education provided by the country’s universities, and determine the rating
Key words: quality of education, monitoring the quality of education, external assessment of educational
achievements, analysis.

Downloads

How to Cite

Serikov, R., Khamzina, A., & Zhabaeva, G. (2020). Analysis of the External Assessment of Educational Achievements in Kazakhstan in 2019. Journal of Educational Sciences, 63(2), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.26577/JES.2020.v63.i2.07

Issue

Section

Evaluation and Measurement In Education: Domestic and Foreign Experience